Core Principle 1
Identify academic direction and supports.
Students are far more likely to succeed in postsecondary education if they have a purpose in mind. Yet many new students start their postsecondary journey without clear goals and in many cases without an understanding of their options. An effective enrollment process is intentionally designed to accomplish critical objectives for equitable student success. Specifically, a well-designed enrollment process empowers students to choose an initial academic direction, identifies the academic and integrated supports needed to pass the critical gateway courses of math and English, and assists them in developing a full academic plan, all within their first year.
For example, many institutions are helping new students choose from a small set of broad career and academic focus areas (sometimes called “meta majors”), such as social and behavioral sciences, information technology, health careers, business, the arts, and STEM. These focus areas are characterized by a default curriculum which includes appropriate math and English courses and is aligned to a specific program of study. By the end of their first year, students are able to make informed choices about their major from among the more defined options within that general area of study. Such an early determination of academic direction helps students better understand the purpose of the courses they are taking, which leads to increased motivation and persistence.
Effective institutions are not focused on screening students out of credit-bearing work and into remediation. Instead, they are designing innovative, aligned, and effective intake processes that help students clarify their goals, build their academic confidence and college know-how, and position themselves for success in gateway courses. It should also be noted that while onboarding is a critical phase in a student’s learning journey, support should continue throughout the journey and not stop after the first year.Next Principle
Altstadt, D., Schmidt, G., and Couturier, L. (2014). “Driving the Direction of Transfer Pathways Reform.” Jobs for the Future.
Bailey, T., Jaggars, S.S., and Jenkins, D. (2015). “Redesigning America’s Community Colleges: A Clearer Path to Student Success.” Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Brongniart, C. (2019). CUNY ASAP: Comprehensive program components. Presented at the Workshop on Increasing Student Success in Developmental Mathematics, Washington, DC.
Chen, X. (2016). Remedial coursetaking at U.S. public 2- and 4-year institutions: Scope, experiences, and outcomes (NCES 2016-405).
Jenkins, D., and Cho, S. (2012). “Get With the Program: Accelerating Community College Students’ Entry Into and Completion of Programs of Study.” (CCRC Working Paper No. 32). New York, NY: Columbia University, Teachers College, Community College Research Center.
Jenkins Webber, A. (2018). Starting to succeed: The impact of CUNY Start on academic momentum—gateway course completion.
Kim, J. (2019). CUNY Start: Maximizing the pre-matriculation space to address remedial needs. Presented at the Workshop on Increasing Student Success in Developmental Mathematics, Washington, DC.
Zeidenberg, M., Cho, S., and Jenkins, D. (2010). “Washington State’s Integrated Basic Education and Skills Training Program (I-BEST): New Evidence of Effectiveness.” (CCRC Working Paper No. 20). New York, NY: Columbia University, Teachers College, Community College Research Center.